A high Google Ads click-through rate feels good.
A low return on ad spend does not.
A recent question came from someone managing advertising for a sizeable Deathcore/metal artist with more than one million followers across social media.
The advertiser was comfortable running paid social campaigns but was struggling to make branded Google Search perform above roughly 2X ROAS.
The campaign data looked confusing.
There was:
- Approximately 15% CTR
- Around £1.50 average CPC
- Approximately 3% conversion rate recently
- Search impression share around 31%
- Search top impression share around 16%
- Absolute top impression share around 10%
- Search lost impression share from budget around 49%
- Search lost impression share from rank around 28%
- Approximately £25/day in budget
Meanwhile, Shopping, Performance Max, Demand Gen, and retargeting had also been tested with mixed results.
At first glance, this looks like a bidding and impression-share problem.
I think the real situation is more interesting.
The Biggest Clue Is Outside Google Ads
The advertiser mentioned something extremely important:
Fans are already asking on social media where the better merchandise is.
There is apparently another established merch operation serving Europe and some US customers.
That older store has a wider and more recognisable product range.
The new US store has limited merchandise.
That creates a very plausible conversion problem:
Fan searches artist → sees official-looking ad → clicks → cannot find expected merch → leaves
That is not primarily a keyword problem.
It is a customer-expectation problem.
Case Overview
| Metric | Reported result |
|---|---|
| CTR | ~15% |
| Average CPC | ~£1.50 |
| Conversion rate | ~3% recently |
| Search impression share | ~31% |
| Search top impression share | ~16% |
| Search absolute top impression share | ~10% |
| Search lost IS (budget) | ~49% |
| Search lost IS (rank) | ~28% |
| Daily budget | ~£25 |
| Primary campaign | Branded Search |
| Other tests | Shopping, PMax, Demand Gen, retargeting |
These figures came from the advertiser’s question and should be verified inside the account using the same date range and reporting level before making large changes.
What Does 31% Search Impression Share Mean?
Google defines Search impression share as:
Impressions received ÷ estimated eligible impressions
So a 31% Search impression share means the advertiser appeared for only part of the Search impression opportunity it was eligible to receive.
Google defines:
Search lost IS (budget) as the percentage of time an ad did not show because the campaign had insufficient budget.
Search lost IS (rank) is the percentage of time it did not show because of insufficient Ad Rank.
In this case, the reported 49% budget loss clearly deserves investigation.
But that does not automatically mean:
“Increase the budget and the sales problem disappears.”
That conclusion assumes the extra traffic converts.
We do not yet know that.
Verify the Impression Share Numbers First
The reported Search impression share, lost-to-budget, and lost-to-rank metrics should be reviewed under the same:
- Campaign
- Date range
- Network
- Reporting level
Do not mix a campaign-level lost-budget metric with keyword-level figures from another period.
Google notes that Search lost IS (budget) is available at campaign level, while impression-share reporting can also exist at keyword and ad-group levels.
Before changing anything, make sure the comparison itself is valid.
Is 15% CTR Good?
A 15% CTR sounds strong.
For a branded campaign, it is not surprising that users familiar with the artist may click at a much higher rate than someone searching a generic product.
But CTR answers only one question:
Did the ad persuade someone to click?
It does not answer:
Did they find something worth buying?
A brand campaign can therefore have an excellent CTR and poor commercial performance.
High CTR Does Not Mean Competitor Click Fraud
The transcript raises the possibility that competitors may be clicking the advertisements.
That should not be the first conclusion from a 15% CTR.
Google defines invalid traffic as clicks and impressions that are not the result of genuine user interest, including fraudulent, accidental, duplicate, bot, and automated activity.
Google says its systems continuously evaluate interactions and filter invalid activity, and advertisers can add the Invalid clicks reporting column to review detected invalid traffic.
So the correct workflow is:
- Check Invalid clicks.
- Check billing adjustments.
- Check analytics/server data when genuinely suspicious.
- Investigate repeated sources if evidence exists.
Do not blame competitors because CTR is high.
Check Auction Insights Immediately
The advertiser suspects that the old merch operation could still be running Search campaigns for the same artist.
This is exactly what Auction Insights is designed to investigate.
Google says Auction Insights allows Search advertisers to compare themselves against other advertisers participating in the same auctions.
For Search campaigns it provides:
- Impression share
- Overlap rate
- Outranking share
- Position above rate
- Top of page rate
- Absolute top of page rate
Run Auction Insights on the branded campaign.
Look for:
- The old official merch store
- Major retailers
- Marketplace sellers
- Unofficial merch sellers
- Print-on-demand competitors
- Other domains bidding on the artist name
This could explain some of the 28% lost impression share from rank.
Separate Brand Navigation From Merch Intent
One of the first structural changes I would consider is separating different branded intentions.
Pure Brand Search
Examples:
[band name]
“band name”
A person typing only the artist name may want:
- Music
- Tour dates
- Videos
- Wikipedia
- Spotify
- Social profiles
- News
- Merchandise
That is not pure ecommerce intent.
Brand + Merch
Examples:
[band name merch]
“band name merchandise”
[band name official merch]
This is much stronger commercial intent.
Brand + Product
Examples:
[band name hoodie]
[band name shirt]
[band name vinyl]
[band name hat]
These users are telling us what they want.
That distinction can transform the analysis.
A campaign may show a 15% CTR overall while its best revenue is concentrated in a very small set of brand + product searches.
Do Shopping Ads Use the Same Logic?
No.
Search campaigns are keyword-driven.
Shopping campaigns rely heavily on product data from Merchant Center.
The advertiser mentioned that Shopping had spent a relatively small amount without producing a conversion.
I would not make a major decision from £31 alone.
First ask:
- What products received impressions?
- Were official products correctly titled?
- Were images competitive?
- Was pricing competitive?
- Did unofficial sellers dominate the auction?
- Was Merchant Center clean?
- Were US shipping terms attractive?
Auction Insights is also available for Shopping campaigns.
Broad Match Does Not Require AI Max
This is an important correction to the original video response.
Broad match keywords can exist without enabling AI Max.
Google’s current AI Max documentation says AI Max can turn on Search Term Matching to expand reach using broad-match and keywordless technologies along with campaign content and landing-page information.
Google separately offers a campaign-level broad-match setting that converts the campaign to broad match and is available when conversion-based Smart Bidding is being used.
These are related Google Ads features.
They are not the same thing.
Should This Brand Campaign Use Broad Match?
For this particular diagnostic stage, I would probably simplify rather than expand.
I would start by understanding:
- Exact brand demand
- Phrase brand demand
- Brand + merch searches
- Brand + product searches
Then expand only when the data supports it.
Broad match can be valuable.
But when the advertiser does not yet understand why branded traffic is failing to purchase, increasing the variety of queries can make diagnosis harder.
Search Terms Should Be Reviewed Frequently
Google’s Search Terms report shows the actual searches that triggered advertisements.
Google specifically recommends using this report to find irrelevant searches that may deserve negative keywords.
For this artist, I would classify queries into buckets.
Commercial Merch
- band name merch
- official band name merch
- band name hoodie
- band name t-shirt
General Brand
- band name
- band name songs
- band name members
Tour Intent
- band name tour
- band name tickets
Music Intent
- band name album
- band name Spotify
- band name lyrics
Potentially Irrelevant
Queries completely unrelated to merchandise.
Then compare:
- CPC
- conversion rate
- revenue
- ROAS
This tells us whether the campaign actually has a PPC problem or is simply buying a lot of non-shopping brand traffic.
Negative Keywords Need Context
Do not add every non-merch search as a negative without thinking.
A fan searching the band may still buy merchandise.
The question is whether that traffic produces enough value.
Use negatives when the economics show that a search theme consistently wastes money.
Google says negative keywords allow advertisers to exclude irrelevant search terms and focus on queries that matter to their customers.
The Old Official Store May Be Cannibalising the New Store
This is one of the most interesting possibilities.
Suppose the fan already knows the older store.
They search the band.
They see:
- New US store ad
- Old store ad
- Organic old store
- Third-party merch sellers
They click the new ad.
Then they discover that the shirt, hoodie, or design they remember is not available there.
They leave and continue searching.
That can produce:
- High CTR
- Low conversion rate
- High CPC
- Weak ROAS
The solution may not be a bid change.
The solution may be merchandising.
Make the New Store’s Role Obvious
If this is the new official US store, say so prominently.
Potential messaging:
Official [Band] US Merch Store
Then explain:
- US fulfilment
- Official licensed merchandise
- Exclusive US items
- Shipping advantage
- New drops
- Limited editions
Only make claims that are actually true and authorized by the artist.
The customer should not have to wonder:
“Is this the real store?”
Product Assortment May Matter More Than Impression Share
The advertiser says fans themselves are complaining about the available merchandise.
That is highly valuable qualitative research.
Imagine increasing Search impression share from 31% to 80%.
You would buy far more clicks.
But if visitors still cannot find the merchandise they came for, the result could simply be:
more spend + same conversion problem
Before aggressively increasing budget, compare the new store and old store.
Look at:
- Number of products
- Best-selling designs
- Price
- Sizes
- Inventory
- Exclusives
- Shipping cost
- Delivery time
- Returns
- Product photography
The paid-media team cannot manufacture product demand for an assortment fans do not want.
Landing Page Relevance Matters
Google recommends choosing landing pages that closely match the advertisement and keywords.
It notes that this alignment contributes to ad relevance and landing-page experience.
For example:
Keyword:
band name hoodie
Ad:
Official Band Name Hoodies – US Store
Landing page:
A general homepage with no visible hoodies.
That is a weak journey.
The better destination is a page where the expected merchandise is immediately visible.
Conversion Tracking Needs an Audit
The advertiser mentioned Google Ads platform performance but did not provide enough detail about the conversion setup.
For ecommerce, I would confirm:
- Purchase is the primary conversion
- One order triggers once
- Correct transaction value passes
- Correct currency passes
- No duplicate GA4/Google Ads purchase events
- Shopify reports reconcile reasonably
- Returns/cancellations are understood
Google’s conversion reporting includes total conversion value and conversion value/cost, which represents conversion value relative to advertising cost.
If the advertiser wants to discuss ROAS, revenue tracking has to be trustworthy.
Why Conversion Rate May Have Fallen From 8% to 3%
A conversion rate can change for many reasons:
- Different date range
- Different queries
- Product inventory
- Promotions ending
- Different devices
- Different regions
- Campaign changes
- Store changes
- Tracking issues
- Small sample size
Do not conclude that Google suddenly “stopped working.”
Segment the data.
Compare the traffic before and after the decline.
Should the Budget Increase?
The reported Search lost IS from budget is approximately 49%.
Google’s definition means the campaign missed eligible Search opportunities because of insufficient budget.
So yes, the budget is constraining reach.
But the correct decision is not automatically:
Raise the budget.
The question is:
What is the marginal ROAS of the additional impressions we would buy?
If current traffic is profitable and conversion quality is good, expanding budget can make sense.
If current branded traffic produces weak economics, more budget may simply scale the weakness.
What About Search Lost IS From Rank?
Google defines Search lost IS (rank) as impressions lost because of poor Ad Rank.
Ad Rank is influenced by more than simply your bid.
Useful areas to review include:
- Ad relevance
- Landing-page experience
- Bid
- Assets
- Query-to-ad alignment
Google’s Quality Score guidance describes ad relevance and landing-page experience as key diagnostic components.
For a branded campaign, I would expect very strong relevance when the account, advertisement, and landing page are structured correctly.
Should You Use Target Impression Share?
Google’s Target Impression Share strategy automatically sets bids with the goal of showing advertisements:
- At the absolute top
- At the top
- Anywhere on the Search results page
It can be useful when visibility is the strategic objective.
A brand may say:
“We want to defend our name and appear prominently whenever people search for us.”
That is a legitimate objective.
But it is not the same objective as:
“We need 3X ROAS.”
Do not confuse visibility bidding with profitability bidding.
Is AI Max the Solution?
Not automatically.
Google’s current AI Max for Search campaigns can expand Search Term Matching and use keywordless technology, creatives, URLs, and other campaign signals to find additional queries.
That can be powerful when an advertiser wants incremental reach.
But this advertiser is still trying to understand why highly recognizable branded traffic is not converting.
I would diagnose the existing demand before aggressively expanding it.
What About Performance Max?
One conversion after a small amount of spend is not enough information to conclude that Performance Max is good or bad.
I would keep its analysis separate from branded Search.
Performance Max has a different inventory mix and optimization system.
Do not combine:
- Search
- Shopping
- Performance Max
- Demand Gen
- Retargeting
into one vague conclusion like:
“Google Ads isn’t working.”
Evaluate each channel according to its role.
Should SEO Replace Paid Search?
No—not automatically.
SEO can be a valuable addition.
Use Search Console and organic data to identify:
- Brand queries
- Merch terms
- Product demand
- High-performing organic pages
- Geographic differences
But SEO does not fix:
- Weak products
- Missing merchandise
- Poor checkout
- Tracking errors
- Confusing store positioning
And strong organic rankings do not automatically mean there is no strategic value in paid brand coverage.
Paid Search and SEO Can Work Together
An effective structure could be:
SEO
Capture:
- Band merch searches
- Product categories
- Artist merch intent
- long-tail branded queries
Paid Search
Control:
- Highest-value brand terms
- Brand + merch
- Brand + product
- promotional searches
- competitive branded auctions
Paid Social
Create demand through:
- New drops
- creative
- fan content
- retargeting
- launches
These channels can support one another.
What I Would Do Next
Step 1: Audit Tracking
Confirm purchase values and duplicates.
Step 2: Segment Branded Intent
Separate:
- band name
- band name merch
- band name product searches
Step 3: Run Auction Insights
Identify the old store and other competitors. Google’s Auction Insights report is specifically designed to show advertisers entering the same auctions.
Step 4: Review Search Terms
Identify irrelevant traffic and product-demand patterns.
Step 5: Simplify Match Types
Temporarily prioritize exact and phrase around the most valuable branded intent while the campaign is being diagnosed.
Step 6: Compare the Stores
Find out what merchandise fans expect but cannot find.
Step 7: Improve Official-Store Positioning
Make the relationship between the artist and the US store unmistakable.
Step 8: Improve Merchandising
Prioritize popular products.
Step 9: Fix Landing Pages
Send hoodie searches to hoodies.
Send shirt searches to shirts.
Step 10: Reassess Impression Share
Only after conversion performance improves should you decide how aggressively to recover the 49% reported budget loss.
My View on the £25/Day Budget
The £25/day budget is clearly limiting the campaign if the reported 49% Search lost IS from budget is accurate.
But I would not increase the campaign simply because Google can spend more.
I would first answer:
- Which searches are converting?
- Which searches are profitable?
- What is the real ROAS?
- Is the old store competing?
- Are fans disappointed by inventory?
- Does the new store look official?
- Is purchase tracking correct?
After that, budget decisions become much easier.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is 15% CTR good for Google Ads?
It can be strong, particularly for a branded Search campaign.
But CTR is not a profitability metric.
Does a high CTR mean competitors are click-frauding the campaign?
No.
Google has systems for identifying invalid clicks, and advertisers can inspect invalid-click reporting.
What does Search impression share mean?
It is the percentage of eligible Search impressions that your ads actually received.
What does Search lost IS budget mean?
It estimates how often your Search ads did not show because of insufficient budget.
What does Search lost IS rank mean?
It estimates how often your Search ads did not show because Ad Rank was too low.
Should I increase the budget when Search lost IS budget is high?
Only when the additional traffic is expected to produce acceptable business results.
Do not scale an unprofitable funnel simply to increase impression share.
Can I see who is competing for my branded keywords?
Auction Insights can show other advertisers participating in overlapping Search auctions when sufficient data is available.
Does broad match require AI Max?
No.
AI Max can use broad-match and keywordless expansion, but broad match itself is not dependent on AI Max.
Should I use AI Max for a brand campaign?
It depends on the objective.
In this case, I would first diagnose the existing branded demand before expanding query coverage.
Should I use only exact match?
Not necessarily permanently.
Exact and phrase can provide clearer diagnostic control while you understand performance. Broader expansion can be tested later.
Should I stop paid search and focus on SEO?
Not solely because the current campaign is underperforming.
SEO can complement paid search, but neither channel fixes a product assortment that fails to meet fan expectations.
Could the old official merch store hurt the new campaign?
Potentially.
It could compete in the auction, attract organic clicks, and set customer expectations around merchandise selection.
Auction Insights and customer journey analysis can help confirm the situation.
Final Verdict
This does not look like a simple:
“Increase impression share”
problem.
The campaign appears to have at least four layers:
- Coverage problem — significant reported impression share lost to budget and rank.
- Intent problem — pure artist-name searches may include many non-shopping users.
- Competition problem — the old official store and third-party sellers may be competing.
- Merchandising problem — fans appear to expect products that the new US store does not currently offer.
The fourth problem may be the most important.
A Google Ads manager can improve:
- Keywords
- bids
- negatives
- ads
- tracking
- budget allocation
But PPC cannot force a fan to buy merchandise they do not want.
Fix the customer experience first.
Then scale the demand.
Professional Google Ads Management
AARSWEBS currently provides Search Ads management, Performance Max, Shopping/Google Merchant Center campaigns, YouTube, Demand Gen, conversion tracking, CRO guidance, search-term optimization, and Google Ads audits.
Visit AARSWEBS.com to discuss your campaign.
Disclaimer
AARSWEBS is an independent digital marketing agency.
Google Partner status does not guarantee performance, ROAS, sales, or special treatment in Google Ads auctions.
Advertising results depend on the brand, market, products, website, competition, conversion tracking, bidding strategy, and budget.